TO CONCLUDE...

Ideally the author would have rather had more meetings and discussion as well as having a more human centred approach with regards to the design stages. That allowed the users to be involved with the initial design stages.  To let the user use pens and paper to draw sketches to gain valuable data about what users found appealing and non-threatening.  The author felt the idea could be difficult to organise with regards to children with autism, arranging availability and the request of parent’s permission. Research would be needed to investigate what considerations were necessary and requirements for evaluating data and feedback, obtained from the children with autism.  The author believed the schedule was plausible to achieve but do to external factors, was not able to follow it.  Which meant, the schedule needed to be evaluate and revised, to determine the priority of the tasks, one regret the author had, was not having the opportunity to develop a task to demonstrate.  Instead of focusing on the development challenges the author focus their attention on the on other aspects of the prototype. 

The author was self learning animation techniques but did not have the opportunity to apply them.  There was concern with regards to evaluating the prototype with autistic children.  Not knowing which evaluation technique would be applicable or appropriate to gain any useful data., whether to consider interviewing or observations with scripts, consent forms and tasks to achieve, or if questionnaires using the likert scale would be beneficial.  More research would be necessary to gather information and advice for the purpose of creating an appropriate evaluation tool.  As mention before about getting the children with autism involved would need a lot of organising.